Commons:Featured picture candidates
Other featured candidates:
Featured picture candidates Featured picture candidates are images that the community will vote on, to determine whether or not they will be highlighted as some of the finest on Commons. This page lists the candidates to become featured pictures. The picture of the day images are selected from featured pictures. Old candidates for Featured pictures are listed here. There are also chronological lists of featured pictures: 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023 and current month. For another overview of our finest pictures, take a look at our annual picture of the year election. |
|||||||||||||||||||
Formal things[edit]Nominating[edit]Guidelines for nominators[edit]Please read the complete guidelines before nominating. This is a summary of what to look for when submitting and reviewing FP candidates:
Artworks, illustrations, and historical documents[edit]There are many different types of non-photographic media, including engravings, watercolors, paintings, etchings, and various others. Hence, it is difficult to set hard-and-fast guidelines. However, generally speaking, works can be divided into three types: Those that can be scanned, those that must be photographed, and those specifically created to illustrate a subject. Works that must be photographed include most paintings, sculptures, works too delicate or too unique to allow them to be put on a scanner, and so on. For these, the requirements for photography, below, may be mostly followed; however, it should be noted that photographs which cut off part of the original painting are generally not considered featurable. Works that may be scanned include most works created by processes that allow for mass distribution − for instance, illustrations published with novels. For these, it is generally accepted that a certain amount of extra manipulation is permissible to remove flaws inherent to one copy of the work, since the particular copy – of which hundreds, or even thousands of copies also exist – is not so important as the work itself. Works created to serve a purpose include diagrams, scientific illustrations, and demonstrations of contemporary artistic styles. For these, the main requirement is that they serve their purpose well. Provided the reproduction is of high quality, an artwork generally only needs one of the following four things to be featurable:
Digital restorations must also be well documented. An unedited version of the image should be uploaded locally, when possible, and cross-linked from the file description page. Edit notes should be specified in detail, such as "Rotated and cropped. Dirt, scratches, and stains removed. Histogram adjusted and colors balanced." Photographs[edit]On the technical side, we have focus, exposure, composition, movement control and depth of field.
On the graphic elements we have shape, volume, color, texture, perspective, balance, proportion, noise, etc.
You will maximise the chances of your nominations succeeding if you read the complete guidelines before nominating. Video and audio[edit]Please nominate videos, sounds, music, etc. at Commons:Featured media candidates. Set nominations[edit]If a group of images are thematically connected in a direct and obvious way, they can be nominated together as a set. A set should fall under one of the following types:
Simple tutorial for new users[edit]Adding a new nomination[edit]If you believe that you have found or created an image that could be considered valuable, with appropriate image description and licensing, then do the following. Step 1: copy the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Your image filename.jpg. Then click on the "create new nomination" button. All single files: For renominations, simply add /2 after the filename. For example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Foo.jpg/2
All set nomination pages should begin "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/", e.g. "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/My Nomination".
Step 3: manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list: Click here, and add the following line to the TOP of the nominations list:
Galleries and FP categories: Please add a gallery page and section heading from the list at Commons FP galleries. Write the code as Page name#Section heading. For example: Optional: if you are not the creator of the image, please notify them using Note: Do not add an 'Alternative' image when you create a nomination. Selecting the best image is part of the nomination process. Alternatives are for a different crop or post-processing of the original image, or a closely related image from the same photo session (limited to 1 per nomination), if they are suggested by voters. Voting[edit]Editors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote. Everybody can vote for their own nominations. Anonymous (IP) votes are not allowed. You may use the following templates:
You may indicate that the image has no chance of success with the template {{FPX|reason - ~~~~}}, where reason explains why the image is clearly unacceptable as a FP. The template can only be used when there are no support votes other than the one from the nominator. A well-written review helps participants (photographers, nominators and reviewers) improve their skills by providing insight into the strengths and weaknesses of a picture. Explain your reasoning, especially when opposing a candidate (which has been carefully selected by the author/nominator). English is the most widely understood language on Commons, but any language may be used in your review. A helpful review will often reference one or more of the criteria listed above. Unhelpful reasons for opposing include:
Remember also to put your signature (~~~~). Featured picture delisting candidates[edit]Over time, featured picture standards change. It may be decided that for some pictures which were formerly "good enough", this is no longer the case. This is for listing an image which you believe no longer deserves to be a featured picture. For these, vote:
This can also be used for cases in which a previous version of an image was promoted to FP, but a newer version of the image has been made and is believed to be superior to the old version, e.g. a newly edited version of a photo or a new scan of a historical image. In particular, it is not intended for replacing older photos of a particular subject with newer photos of the same subject, or in any other case where the current FP and the proposed replacement are essentially different images. For these nominations, vote:
If you believe that some picture no longer meets the criteria for FP, you can nominate it for delisting, copying the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box: In the new delisting nomination page just created you should include:
After that, you have to manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list. As a courtesy, leave an informative note on the talk page(s) of the original creator, uploader(s), and nominator with a link to the delisting candidate. {{subst:FPC-notice-removal}} can be used for this purpose. Featured picture candidate policy[edit]General rules[edit]
Featuring and delisting rules[edit]A candidate will become a featured picture in compliance with following conditions:
The delisting rules are the same as those for FPs, with voting taking place over the same time period. The rule of the 5th day is applied to delisting candidates that have received no votes to delist, other than that of the proposer, by day 5. There is also a limit of two active delisting nominations per user, which is in addition to the limit of two active regular nominations. The FPCBot handles the vote counting and closing in most cases, current exceptions are candidates containing multiple versions of the image as well as FPXed and withdrawn nominations. Any experienced user may close the requests not handled by the bot. For instructions on how to close nominations, see Commons:Featured picture candidates/What to do after voting is finished. Also note that there is a manual review stage between when the bot has counted the votes and before the nomination is finally closed by the bot; this manual review can be done by any user familiar with the voting rules. Above all, be polite[edit]Please don't forget that the image you are judging is somebody's work. Avoid using phrases like "it looks terrible" and "I hate it". If you must oppose, please do so with consideration. Also remember that your command of English might not be the same as someone else's. Choose your words with care. Happy judging… and remember... all rules can be broken. See also[edit]
|
Table of contents[edit]
Featured picture candidates[edit]
File:Ourapteryx clara formosana late instar larva.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 13 Feb 2024 at 15:41:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Geometridae (Geometer Moths)
- Info Late instar larva of Ourapteryx clara (subspecies formosana) from Taiwan. Larvae of this geometer moth common in Asian monsoon region has rarely been documented. Also, this is the first time a Sapindaceae species is recorded as the host plant of the species-rich genus Ourapteryx. All by Tiouraren -- Tiouraren (talk) 15:41, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Tiouraren (talk) 15:41, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Perfect for VIC but too poor technical quality for FP or QI. Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:57, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- I would love to know what it means. I thought the image is sharp enough and the larva is focused. -- Tiouraren (talk) 18:18, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- As a laboratory photo, it would surely been possible to arrange the lighting better? The background is unhelpful. I don't do lab shots, but I am surprised you would choose to use a flash. F18 give s good depth of field but affects quality; the definition is not so great for such a large caterpillar. Might a focus stack have been a solution? Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:57, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- I would love to know what it means. I thought the image is sharp enough and the larva is focused. -- Tiouraren (talk) 18:18, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
File:Pistesääsklase Culiceta annulata tiib.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 13 Feb 2024 at 15:32:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Diptera
- Info created & uploaded by Enno Merivee - nominated by Kruusamägi (talk) 15:32, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Kruusamägi (talk) 15:32, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support All new to me, and the quality seems excellent. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:01, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support This is delicate. --Tiouraren (talk) 18:15, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good stuff Poco a poco (talk) 18:49, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support Юрий Д.К 23:45, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 01:00, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:27, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support It is said in the description that this image is a crop from a large picture of 41,632 x 17,530 pixels. I would love to see this monster :-) Basile Morin (talk) 01:55, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support Me too. Another option would be to present images of every part of the insect's body, cropped from the original, as a set. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:43, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
File:Pupae of the parasitoid Paracodrus apterogynus.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 13 Feb 2024 at 15:23:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Hymenoptera
- Info created & uploaded by Enno Merivee - nominated by Kruusamägi (talk) 15:23, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Kruusamägi (talk) 15:23, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support Fascinating. Looks very well executed. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:03, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 18:49, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support Юрий Д.К 23:42, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:27, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support Apart from the right part slightly out of focus, the image is very detailed. Interesting capture as well -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:49, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Charles and Basile. Excellent, and different from the usual FP noms. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:45, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
File:Wasserkuppe (Weiherberg) 1.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 13 Feb 2024 at 15:05:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Germany#Hesse
- Info View of the highest mountain in Hesse, the Wasserkuppe. All by me. -- Milseburg (talk) 15:05, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Milseburg (talk) 15:05, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support I feel cold just looking at this beautiful photo Cmao20 (talk) 15:12, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:27, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful details and nice land shapes. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:47, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
File:Ópera, París, Francia, 2022-10-31, DD 54-56 HDR.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 13 Feb 2024 at 12:57:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#France
- Info Ceiling over the Grand staircase in Garnier Opera or Palais Garnier, Paris, France. It was built for the Paris Opera from 1861 to 1875 at the behest of Emperor Napoleon III following the plans of architect Charles Garnier. It was the primary theatre of the Paris Opera and its associated Paris Opera Ballet until 1989, when a new opera house, the Opéra Bastille. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 12:57, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 12:57, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 14:34, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support There are a couple of strange shadows and light trails at the bottom right that I wonder if you could work on. But they do not affect the interesting bit of this ceiling, and the subject, resolution and detail is easily sufficient for FP to me. Cmao20 (talk) 14:47, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Good point, Cmao20, I oversaw that, it was a real issue that's why I now opted for a square crop, FYI too, @Thi, Charlesjsharp, and ArionStar: Poco a poco (talk) 18:47, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Better but you exported it at the wrong size Poco a poco Cmao20 (talk) 19:14, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Oops, fixed, thank you Poco a poco (talk) 19:28, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support Still used for ballet performances. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:05, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 17:45, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support Юрий Д.К 23:41, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
File:Vincent van Gogh - The yellow house ('The street').jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 13 Feb 2024 at 12:57:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Exteriors
- Info created by Vincent van Gogh - uploaded by Crisco 1492 - nominated by Moheen -- ~Moheen (keep talking) 12:57, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ~Moheen (keep talking) 12:57, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support Famous painting, good accurate digitisation Cmao20 (talk) 14:06, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful reproduction, and it's interesting to zoom in and see the simplifications that work. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:50, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
File:Laranjas-pera.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 13 Feb 2024 at 12:42:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Food and drink#Fruits (raw)
- Info Citrus × sinensis oranges in a grocery store, Colatina, Espírito Santo, Brazil. Created, uploaded and nominated by ★ -- ★ 12:42, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ★ 12:42, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 14:05, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 17:59, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I have to say that I'm not convinced by the bottom crop. The image should habe been taken either closer or further to the top so that we have a pattern Poco a poco (talk) 18:50, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 20:38, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support I'm liking this composition better than that of your photo of limes, though crops are always debatable. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:53, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
File:Ernest Shackleton before 1909.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 13 Feb 2024 at 07:34:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1900-1909
- Info created by George Charles Beresford - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 07:34, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 07:34, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 08:31, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 14:35, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good restoration. I prefer the yellow skin tone of the original, but I recognize that that's caused by aging and not intentional in a black and white photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:17, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:18, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 17:59, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support Well restored photo of an admirable person. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:24, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
File:Bois Raquet, in the High Fens – Eifel Nature Park (DSCF6655).jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 13 Feb 2024 at 03:02:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Belgium
- Info A special and atmospheric forest photo, IMO could be a movie set. created by Trougnouf - uploaded by Trougnouf - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 03:02, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 03:02, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Strong support Crepuscular rays are a game changer here. ★ 03:12, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 04:22, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support per nom and Arion. This would be a very good composition even without the crepuscular rays, but those make it more special. An additional category for this specific type of tree would be welcome. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:57, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Laitche (talk) 07:17, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support Pretty amazing sight. --SHB2000 (talk) 07:50, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 08:08, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 08:31, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support Юрий Д.К 08:34, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:15, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:16, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support Eye-catching sun rays -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:43, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
File:Rethymno old harbour lighthouse 1.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 13 Feb 2024 at 03:02:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers#Greece
- Info IMO a harmonious satisfying composition and exceptionally beautiful light. created by Nino Verde - uploaded by Nino Verde - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 03:02, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 03:02, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 03:10, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 04:22, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support per nom. Also a pretty scene, and it's the light and shadow, not just the light (to my way of thinking, anyway). I doubt it was really 08:21 local time, though. It looks closer to sunrise or sunset. User:Nino Verde, if you're reading, any comments on that? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:52, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 08:31, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:15, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support Composition and mood -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:42, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
File:Carved wooden bench furniture and crafts at Heuan Chan heritage house in Luang Prabang Laos.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 13 Feb 2024 at 01:21:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Others
- Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:21, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:21, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 03:06, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support Laos well-represented with Basile Morin. ★ 03:14, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support The bench is the most interesting object in the photo, but the overall composition is nice, too. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:54, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 08:29, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Question Is that not a Thai triangle floor cushion? Or did the classic Thai design originate in Laos? Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:19, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- That’s a tricky question you’re asking me there -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:02, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- If it is Thai, like the one in my garage, then it is out of place in this image. Pay the house another visit? Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:09, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Not misplaced on this bench. But perhaps misplaced in a garage :-) These cushions are very widespread in South-East Asia and commonly used for massages. Sometimes on the floor, sometimes on a bed, a couch or a bench. This house is managed by Laotian people who aim to spread local traditions. Similarly this table placed on a bed is an intentional presentation. It is certainly more comfortable to read a book leaning against a soft cushion than against the rigid wooden upright -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:35, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:12, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
File:Lucas Cranach dÆ, Melankolien, 1532, KMSsp722, Statens Museum for Kunst.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 12 Feb 2024 at 22:14:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery:Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic_media/Entertainment#Myth,_legends_and_proverbs
- Info Allegorical painting by Lucas Cranach - uploaded by WLKBot - nominated by -- Thi (talk) 22:14, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Thi (talk) 22:14, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support Юрий Д.К 00:04, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 03:06, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 03:15, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 04:23, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 08:29, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Unfortunately the foot of the painting (literally) is cropped off in this image. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:25, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I'm having trouble finding a clear image that demonstrates this. Could you possibly link one? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:59, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
File:Hosta flower-20230730-RM-112817.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 12 Feb 2024 at 20:55:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants/Asparagales#Family_:_Asparagaceae
- Info Blossom of a hosta flower. Focus stack of 21 frames. All by me -- Ermell (talk) 20:55, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ermell (talk) 20:55, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice light and focus -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:08, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support I love your focus stacks Cmao20 (talk) 03:06, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ermell and Famberhorst are the official FP's focus stackers! ★ 03:18, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful at full size. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:10, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 04:23, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 08:28, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:10, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Ikan. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:08, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support Юрий Д.К 23:39, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
File:Lion waiting in Namibia.jpg (delist)[edit]
Voting period ends on 12 Feb 2024 at 20:12:08
- Info Created by yaaaay - uploaded by FlickrLickr - nominated by Fabien1309. (Original nomination)
- Delist Resolution. -- Alu (talk) 20:12, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delist We have very many better. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:50, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delist Hard to call a QI in today's age either. --SHB2000 (talk) 00:10, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delist Probably great at the time but clearly no longer so Cmao20 (talk) 03:05, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delist per Cmao20. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:12, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
File:015 Chimpanzee at Kibale forest National Park Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 12 Feb 2024 at 15:08:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family : Hominidae (Great Apes)
- Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 15:08, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 15:08, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Alu (talk) 15:24, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support Some will not like the noise and sharpening, but there's not much light in the Kibale Forest and this is a nice shot. Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:11, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:01, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support High resolution and natural environment -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:07, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Charles Cmao20 (talk) 03:04, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 03:19, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 04:23, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 07:51, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 08:28, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Milseburg (talk) 15:07, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:09, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Basile. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:05, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
File:Puente Helix, museo ArtScience y hotel Marina Bay Sands, Marina Bay, Singapur, 2023-08-17, DD 67-69 HDR.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 12 Feb 2024 at 12:57:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Singapore
- Info View of the Helix Bridge, the Marina Bay Sands Hotel and the ArtScience Museum during the blue hour, Marina Bay, Singapore. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 12:57, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 12:57, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Comment The picture in itself is fine, but having been there a couple of times, the PoV does not do just to the museum or the hotel (you can't see the holes...). Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:50, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- To me the highlight here is the bridge, that's why I focused on it. Poco a poco (talk) 14:50, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support I like this very much. I think I might like it even more if some of the sky were cropped out, but your choice. Cmao20 (talk) 14:17, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 14:36, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support Юрий Д.К 00:05, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral The real highlight here is Marina Bay Sands, which is not what's being focused on here. --SHB2000 (talk) 00:11, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Comment It seems tilted to me. The MBS hotel is leaning to the right and the water is not horizontal -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:59, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Basile Morin: I uploaded a new version, I took as reference the lower are in the middle, not the hotel, which is tricky, FYI, Cmao20, I also cropped the sky a bit Poco a poco (talk) 12:59, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- To me a solid improvement. Cmao20 (talk) 14:05, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support Interesting composition and nice blue hour -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:29, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Milseburg (talk) 15:09, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
File:Limões-persa.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 12 Feb 2024 at 10:14:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Food and drink#Fruits (raw)
- Info Persian limes in a grocery store, Colatina, Espírito Santo, Brazil. Created, uploaded and nominated by ★ -- ★ 10:14, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support No fruit sleeves now. And I like the eye-catching depth effect it causes in my mind. -- ★ 10:14, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support Like this. Colourful and well composed. It's a shame that the density of how they are packed is quite low so that one can see the white background behind them, but overall this is your first original FP to me. Cmao20 (talk) 11:59, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you so much for the review and support. They were on a steel tray; I think this doesn't ruin the composition. ★ 12:12, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:07, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support Юрий Д.К 00:11, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 00:11, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 08:25, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:07, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
File:Four domestic ducks simultaneously diving in a pond.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 12 Feb 2024 at 02:02:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Anseriformes#Genus : Anas
- Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:02, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support This unexpected coordination makes me laugh. 🦆 Ostrich effect :-) Basile Morin (talk) 02:02, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support Funny Cmao20 (talk) 14:18, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose A common enough sight and it doesn't have anything special to say, perhaps symmetry? like this one. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:16, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support Юрий Д.К 00:10, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose No wow – similar issue as this. --SHB2000 (talk) 00:12, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
File:Endless hills of Pienza1.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 11 Feb 2024 at 23:48:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Italy#Tuscany
- Info Hills in Pienza, Tuscany, Italy. Сreated by Tom Ek - uploaded/nominated by Юрий Д.К 23:48, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support Юрий Д.К 23:48, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Comment A tree on the top center is distracting. --Laitche (talk) 13:16, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support Wonderful composition and subject, and to me the tree is a feature not a bug Cmao20 (talk) 14:19, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:17, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 08:24, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Nice but tilted in cw direction Poco a poco (talk) 13:10, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
File:Nepal Yak - Himalaya trekking.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 11 Feb 2024 at 23:41:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family : Bovidae (Bovids)
- Info Pack yak in Himalayas, Nepal. Сreated by Tom Ek - uploaded/nominated by Юрий Д.К 23:41, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support Юрий Д.К 23:41, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good quality, colours and composition Cmao20 (talk) 14:21, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 14:37, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:09, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support Top crop is lower than I like, but a special picture. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:39, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Ermell (talk) 20:03, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Ikan -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:46, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support also per Ikan Poco a poco (talk) 13:11, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:05, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Milseburg (talk) 15:10, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 18:02, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
File:Muhammad Ali, gtfy.00140.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 11 Feb 2024 at 22:17:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Men
- Info created by Bernard Gotfryd, restored, uploaded, and nominated by Yann
- Support According to Wikipedia "one of the most significant sports figures of the 20th century". Great portrait, may be one of the best portrait of him on the Net. -- Yann (talk) 22:17, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Excellent portrait, but I don't like the right and left crops, and if it's a historical photo, maybe it shouldn't be cropped at all. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:17, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for your comment. On the left, I only cropped the black border. On the right, I removed the half-head, which is detrimental to the composition. Yann (talk) 08:37, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose We should not crop historical images. Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:52, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Stop inventing rules and pretexts to justify your votes. Yann (talk) 18:00, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Try and behave yourself. I am not inventing rules. I am giving my opinion which I am 100% entitled to. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:49, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, you are inventing rules. There is no such rule as "We should not crop historical images." Yann (talk) 17:55, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Like he said, it's his opinion, and you should back off. It's an idea that's been broached many times on FPC. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:01, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
- I agree with Charles. Historical images should not be altered if we use them in an encyclopedic context. I don't like that this cropped version is being used on different language versions. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 18:19, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Many historical FP are cropped, for a reason or another. There are dozens of examples. Yann (talk) 18:22, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- I know. That just doesn't make it right. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 18:25, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Frank Schulenburg: Historical images are altered all the time. They are restored, and many decisions have to be taken about colors, how much restoration should be done, etc. In addition, it doesn't make sense here because this is not scanned from a print. This is a slide, which was never printed as it is. Whoever may have printed it did alter it one way or another, at least cropping the black borders. Yann (talk) 17:55, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support: clearly superior composition compared to the original. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 19:18, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Concrete fence of Nagai Botanical Garden (B&W), January 2024[edit]
Voting period ends on 11 Feb 2024 at 19:09:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Black and White#Structures
- Info Concrete fence of Nagai Botanical Garden. c/u//n by Laitche -- Laitche (talk) 19:09, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Laitche (talk) 19:09, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good intriguing abstract, B&W was the right choice here to highlight the shadows of the tree branches Cmao20 (talk) 14:20, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Support ★ 14:37, 3 February 2024 (UTC)- Comment Nominated the alternative since no votes and no comments were added. --Laitche (talk) 16:56, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Alternative[edit]
- Info Camera angle change with tripod. --Laitche (talk) 16:56, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Laitche (talk) 16:56, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support I prefer this version. ★ 22:05, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
File:021 Wild smiling harbor seal at Jökulsárlón (Iceland) Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 11 Feb 2024 at 13:20:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family : Phocidae (Earless Seals)
- Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:20, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:20, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support From a boat or from swimming?--Ermell (talk) 23:29, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- From the shore with camera at water level to create depth of field. Giles Laurent (talk) 15:03, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support Striking view, nice angle and good quality -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:36, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support Юрий Д.К 01:46, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support Playing peek-a-boo in the water! ★ 14:38, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Laitche (talk) 14:46, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:15, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:13, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 08:22, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 13:11, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:03, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
File:Galah (Eolophus roseicapilla) female in flight Mount Pleasant.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 11 Feb 2024 at 09:47:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Cacatuidae (Cockatoos)
- Info Same species as my other nomination. Females have pink eyes. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:47, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:47, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support Amazing work Cmao20 (talk) 10:44, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 22:07, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Could with some cropping at the left side.--Ermell (talk) 23:31, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support Well frozen in flight. Perhaps a small crop at the left and at the top (not much) could improve the composition (note added) -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:34, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support Excellent, per others. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:10, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 14:39, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- A new version with small crop uploaded. Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:17, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 13:14, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Milseburg (talk) 15:11, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
File:Cala Berretta1.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 11 Feb 2024 at 00:18:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Italy#Sicily
- Info: Cala Beretta, Zingaro Nature Preserve; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:18, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:18, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support I was thinking this might possibly be a drone picture. It would be great for a drone picture. It's not so sharp for a digital SLR, but this has to be a somewhat distant view. And I think it's a great long-range view and a really good, pleasant composition. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:58, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great composition and lovely deep blue colours. I don't think it's a drone pic but the quality is nonetheless adequate IMO Cmao20 (talk) 10:43, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- It's not a drone pic. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:46, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 14:40, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support Юрий Д.К 00:09, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 08:21, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Pretty but lacks wow IMHO, sorry Poco a poco (talk) 13:13, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
File:US Marshals with Young Ruby Bridges on School Steps.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 10 Feb 2024 at 21:44:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#1960-1969
- Info created by United States Department of Justice - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 21:44, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 21:44, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great historical picture. Yann (talk) 22:59, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 23:02, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 23:18, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:21, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Yann. Adam, please update the link to the source file. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:54, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Can't really do much with changes to websites that hide images. Plenty of evidence this is a DoJ photo, but websites change since we got the high-res copy, or maybe the high-res is from elsewhere. Unclear. Adam Cuerden (talk) 07:24, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- I'm not disputing who took the photo! I'm quite familiar with it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:47, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Understood! Just hard to be sure of the source. I've found a similar one, but it's slightly lower file size, and slightly worse. Adam Cuerden (talk) 19:33, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- I'm not disputing who took the photo! I'm quite familiar with it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:47, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support Important contemporary document. -- Radomianin (talk) 07:44, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:53, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support This was printed in my school history textbook Cmao20 (talk) 10:42, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Giles Laurent (talk) 13:21, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Wilfredor (talk) 17:55, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Laitche (talk) 12:49, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Ermell (talk) 20:06, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:59, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
File:Sperlinga panorama.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 10 Feb 2024 at 20:23:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Italy
- Info: second nomination. Reprocessed and lifted the shadows, while maintaining the light accent on the village. -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:23, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:23, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support Quality IMO not perfect but interesting composition and nice light on the village = deserves a star Cmao20 (talk) 10:41, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Light isn't very interesting, and this not very sharp. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 12:47, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support Юрий Д.К 00:08, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Sebring12Hrs Poco a poco (talk) 13:13, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Alternative[edit]
- Info: alternative with partially sunlit cliff. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:18, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:18, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
File:Galah (Eolophus roseicapilla albiceps) male Adelaide.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 10 Feb 2024 at 10:15:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Cacatuidae (Cockatoos)
- Info One current FP of the head. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:15, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:15, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support
A bit dark on my monitor.But clearly outstanding in terms of composition and quality Cmao20 (talk) 19:28, 1 February 2024 (UTC) - Oppose Not exceptional for a common bird. --SHB2000 (talk) 20:23, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Neutral A bit Underexposed. ★ 21:36, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
- New version uploaded with exposure adjusted. Charlesjsharp (talk) 22:28, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support Better now. ★ 23:15, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good enough for me! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:03, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:52, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:57, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support Юрий Д.К 00:07, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support Not the best setting but nice quality compensates it Poco a poco (talk) 13:13, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
File:Mamões.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 10 Feb 2024 at 14:53:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Food and drink#Fruits (raw)
- Info Papaya fruits in a grocery store, Colatina, Espírito Santo, Brazil. Created, uploaded and nominated by ★ -- ★ 14:53, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Now nominated by User:Ikan Kekek. Please continue to vote and express your opinion. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:14, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support Eye-catching colors and textures! -- ★ 14:53, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose
Eye-catching for all the wrong reasons. Useful only as marketing for the manufacturers of theI dislike the plastic sleeves. Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:21, 1 February 2024 (UTC)- "Your photo is useful only as…"
- It's time to receive some "helpful" comments about my self-published work's journey on Commons (BTW, I don't know if you know but papaya fruits are commonly sold in sleeves like this). ★ 17:05, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
- I apologise. I was not polite enough. Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:12, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral Quite good image quality for a phone, but I too dislike the plastic sleeves Cmao20 (talk) 19:25, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support If you think of this as an abstract composition and disregard the environmentally problematic fact that the sleeves are plastic, you might or might not agree with me that this is a very good composition with excellent motion around the picture frame, and as Arion says, interesting textures. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:01, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Perfect! That's the point! ★ 02:08, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support Looks more authentic with the sleeve. --SHB2000 (talk) 09:46, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Yes! As Ikan Kekek flawlessly stated, the sleeves gives me the sensation of motion. ★ 12:33, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:52, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, but not for the plastic covers. Yann (talk) 17:46, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Yann. -- Karelj (talk) 22:44, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination OK. ★ 10:09, 3 February 2024 (UTC)Took over by Ikan Kekek. ★ 00:38, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Premature withdrawal unless you were convinced by the opposing arguments. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:41, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Three opposes; no chance to be featured. FP in my heart. ★ 19:49, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Things can change last-minute. Sometimes it's better to just wait and see. --SHB2000 (talk) 00:13, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Three opposes; no chance to be featured. FP in my heart. ★ 19:49, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Arion, you're clearly incorrect that a nomination with 4 supports and 3 opposes has no chance to be featured. Would you consent for me to take over the nomination, or better yet, would you like to rescind your withdrawal? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:37, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, feel free to take over it. ★ 00:38, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Arion, you're clearly incorrect that a nomination with 4 supports and 3 opposes has no chance to be featured. Would you consent for me to take over the nomination, or better yet, would you like to rescind your withdrawal? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:37, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Premature withdrawal unless you were convinced by the opposing arguments. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:41, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support Юрий Д.К 08:33, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
File:Hot-air balloon in Tambov - 02.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 10 Feb 2024 at 10:28:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Air transport#Aerostats
- Info created & uploaded by Саня Новиков - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 10:28, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support Too simple? I like it anyhow. -- Tomer T (talk) 10:28, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support Simple but colorful! ★ 10:53, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 17:02, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 19:23, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 20:23, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:28, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very convincing composition. -- Radomianin (talk) 22:24, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:51, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Giles Laurent (talk) 13:22, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Laitche (talk) 19:27, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support Юрий Д.К 00:07, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 13:14, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:57, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
File:First medical X-ray by Wilhelm Röntgen of his wife Anna Bertha Ludwig's hand - 18951222.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 9 Feb 2024 at 22:43:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#1850-1899
- Info created by Wilhelm Röntgen, restored, uploaded, and nominated by Yann
- Support First X-ray picture, high resolution, restored. -- Yann (talk) 22:43, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support Impressive capture and restoration! ★ 22:53, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 10:35, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 16:19, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 19:21, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support per ArionStar. -- Radomianin (talk) 22:17, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great document! And well presented by you. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:56, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:50, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Giles Laurent (talk) 13:22, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 22:07, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support Юрий Д.К 01:48, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 13:17, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Laitche (talk) 15:25, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:55, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
File:Saint Mary of the Assumption Parish (Springboro, Ohio) - stained-glass, Adoration by the Shepherds detail 2.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 9 Feb 2024 at 17:37:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Single stained glass windows
- Info created by Nheyob - uploaded by Nheyob - nominated by Nheyob -- Nheyob (talk) 17:37, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
- Abstain As author. -- Nheyob (talk) 17:37, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support v nice photo. So that's one of the shepherds looking at Jesus? Cmao20 (talk) 19:21, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
- That's right. I haven't seen the "Adoration by the Shepherds" arranged quite this way before. I found it novel and charming. -Nheyob (talk) 20:12, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support Lovely and good quality; thanks for the nomination! -- Radomianin (talk) 22:21, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 23:19, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful. Looks like a stained glass version of a pastel. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:54, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Giles Laurent (talk) 13:23, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:23, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Very good but needs information/template to show why it is in the public domain (age?) since there is no FoP on artworks in the US. Will support once this is added. BigDom (talk) 23:57, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for the question. The window was made by the studio of F.X. Zettler who died in 1916. --Nheyob (talk) 03:00, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support OK, thanks. I dug around and got some historical info about the windows from a couple of sources I found, so have added that to the description. Supporting now as promised. BigDom (talk) 06:40, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for the question. The window was made by the studio of F.X. Zettler who died in 1916. --Nheyob (talk) 03:00, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:54, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 21:59, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
File:African Safari in Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Safari Park.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 9 Feb 2024 at 16:38:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals
- Info created by Azim Khan Ronnie - uploaded by Azim Khan Ronnie - nominated by Moheen -- ~Moheen (keep talking) 16:38, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ~Moheen (keep talking) 16:38, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Not an African safari, where drones would rightly be banned. And if it was, this would not be the best point of view to show off the animals. Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:59, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
- This photo was taken at Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Safari Park, Bangladesh, not in Africa. ~Moheen (keep talking) 06:32, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
- I know. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:57, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
- In which case why does the image title refer to it as 'African safari'?? Cmao20 (talk) 19:20, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I think because these are African animals. I'm sure it was a fun outing for the photographer, and this photo is a very nice keepsake for him, but it's good but not extraordinary to look at. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:22, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- In which case why does the image title refer to it as 'African safari'?? Cmao20 (talk) 19:20, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
- I know. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:57, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
- This photo was taken at Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Safari Park, Bangladesh, not in Africa. ~Moheen (keep talking) 06:32, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Ikan. --SHB2000 (talk) 10:09, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
File:Ravi Varma-Lady playing the swarbat.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 9 Feb 2024 at 12:25:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/People
- Info created by Raja Ravi Varma - uploaded by Yann - nominated by Moheen -- ~Moheen (keep talking) 12:25, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ~Moheen (keep talking) 12:25, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 13:05, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
Support --Thi (talk) 13:55, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Texture is perhaps too visible due the light. --Thi (talk) 16:28, 2 February 2024 (UTC)Support ★ 14:12, 31 January 2024 (UTC)- Per below. ★ 19:13, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Seems poorly lit to me. I haven't seen the painting in person, but the picture is so dark, it prevents wow for me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:19, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Ikan + poor crop. --SHB2000 (talk) 10:09, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Ikan. -- Karelj (talk) 17:05, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
File:At Dunham Massey 2024 014 - Snowdrops.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 8 Feb 2024 at 23:30:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Plants/Asparagales#Family_:_Amaryllidaceae
- Info created by Mike Peel - uploaded by Mike Peel - nominated by Mike Peel -- Mike Peel (talk) 23:30, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mike Peel (talk) 23:30, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 00:52, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Technical quality so-so. Artefacts around many flowers. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:41, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Charlesjsharp: Thanks for looking, could you be more specific about the artefacts you're seeing please? Am happy to upload a new version if I can see and fix them. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 23:09, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The background is too busy for my taste and the lighting nothing special. Sorry.--Ermell (talk) 09:46, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Cluttered background is distracting in my view -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:58, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
- Comment In my opinion, plants and flowers stand out adequately against the natural background. The leaves in the foreground are excellent. However, the lenticular aspect of the background is disappointing. Is it a consequence of image processing? Can it be amended? --Harlock81 (talk) 12:31, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Harlock81: I'm not sure what you mean by 'lenticular aspect', but is this improved in the new version? Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 20:54, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 16:20, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I like the background, to me it's not so much cluttered as contextualised, it's nice to see the flowers presented in their natural surroundings like this. The depth of field is a little low but I think it's okay on the whole for such a nice composition. Can you please correct the very obvious chromatic aberration on several of the flowers, and then I'll support. Cmao20 (talk) 19:19, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Cmao20: CA should be reduced in the new version, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 20:54, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Much better, Support now Cmao20 (talk) 20:58, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support Юрий Д.К 01:47, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Background behind the flowers is too distracting to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:36, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 19:04, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
File:The Martyrdom of Saint Dorothea by Josse van der Baren St Peter collegiate church in Leuven (1).jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 8 Feb 2024 at 14:27:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Religion#Christianity
- Info all by Tournasol7. I'm not sure about FP gallery. If you find a more appropriate category, please correct it :) -- Tournasol7 (talk) 14:27, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
- Changed to a category where it matches well with the existing FPs. Cmao20 (talk) 15:03, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
- Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 14:27, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support Really interesting artwork, elegantly presented in its context as displayed. Cmao20 (talk) 15:01, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 15:19, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
- Comment The pictures on the side would be better taken at right angles to each painting and three images presented as a set. Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:48, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Having another look, I don't think this does the artworks any favours. The doors aren't even fully open and are not open the same amount. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:01, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support Юрий Д.К 21:52, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao20. --Aristeas (talk) 08:17, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:16, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nicely captured triptych. -- Radomianin (talk) 19:20, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support This is a faithful representation of the view we have when facing the whole -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:51, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, but the doors are on hinges. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:58, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
- Intentionally displayed like that in the church I suppose -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:55, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 05:33, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- RodRabelo7 (talk) 08:40, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I agree with Charles that the fact that the paintings on the right and left are not open to the same degree is problematic. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:13, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:46, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per above, noce compo but 2 of the images depicted are distorted Poco a poco (talk) 13:15, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
File:Domplatz 9 in Merseburg (1).jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 8 Feb 2024 at 14:16:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors/Germany#Saxony-Anhalt
- Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 14:16, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
- Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 14:16, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Hmm, I hate to say it but I think this falls into the 'good QI' category for me. The subject is really interesting but the light is not the best and it's not your sharpest. Cmao20 (talk) 15:01, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose per Cmao20. Pretty motif, but no special light, and the upper reaches might be sharper for FP. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:17, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination --Tournasol7 (talk) 06:31, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Statues on the gable of Linderhof Palace[edit]
Voting period ends on 8 Feb 2024 at 13:36:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page
-
"Agriculture" and "Trade"
-
"Atlas"
-
"Science" and "Industry"
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Statues outdoors
- Info The gable of the middle section of the South facade of Linderhof Palace is crowned of Atlas as a central figure. On the left side of the gable are standing two statues, representing "Agriculture" and "Trade", on the right side the statues "Science" and "Industry". For the whole gable see here; created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 13:36, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Llez (talk) 13:36, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose with regret. I was ready to support this because it's really interesting and a correct use of the set nomination mechanism. But the middle image of the Atlas statue is just not sharp. Cmao20 (talk) 14:34, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Not a set. Other statues missing. And the centre image is not to scale. It is larger than the others. Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:53, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Irrespective of whether this is a proper set, Atlas is not sharp enough and wouldn't get my support if that picture were nominated individually. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:53, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Alternative[edit]
Allegoric statues on the gable of Linderhof Palace[edit]
-
"Agriculture" and "Trade"
-
"Science" and "Industry"
- Info According to the comment of Cmao20 --Llez (talk) 15:10, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 15:11, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:12, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 15:19, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose This cannot be a set as there are many more statues on the facade, including the one deleted (which was not to scale). Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:51, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
- Comment But this are the only allegoric statues (see the title of this alternative set), the others are "normal" angels and putti, and Atlas, a mythological person (see here) --Llez (talk) 18:21, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support IMHO this works as a set because it shows all four allegorical statues of the façade. Their names form also a (at that time common) summary of the most important kinds of business, so they are complete. @Llez: I have marked three dust spots on the left image (see image notes on the file description page) and would suggest to fix them. --Aristeas (talk) 08:10, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
- Done Thanks for the review and the hint --Llez (talk) 13:09, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you! --Aristeas (talk) 14:21, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
- Done Thanks for the review and the hint --Llez (talk) 13:09, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I can't detect WOW anywhere here. Sorry.--Ermell (talk) 09:25, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:18, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support as per Aristeas' supporting statement. -- Radomianin (talk) 22:35, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose In both pictures the tiny part of the pillar visible at the left or at the right is ruining the composition. Also bottom-up angle of view is not so appealing. Insufficient wow factor to outweighs these two problems in my view -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:49, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
- Unfortunately the new versions with architectural elements removed are fake representations of the reality. Retouching such images by removing temporary elements (like a distracting plane for example, or litter), is generally acceptable, but not permanent elements which are structural parts of the site, in my opinion. Misleading images, all the more as {{Retouched}} is missing -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:51, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- I added {{Retouched}} in the file description --Llez (talk) 06:33, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- I would support these if the parts of the pillar were removed. Yann (talk) 15:35, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
- Info Thanks for the suggestion, I removed it --Llez (talk) 16:34, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 16:21, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good and deserving set to me, though the faces look at bit sharper in the one on the right. I don't know what the alternative to a bottom-up angle would be, but I'm fine with it, because it's a normal view a person would be likely to see from life. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:51, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Giles Laurent (talk) 13:24, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good now. --Yann (talk) 17:48, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I have to agree, sorry, wow-lacking nom. Furthermore I'm not sure if this nom can be considered a set Poco a poco (talk) 13:08, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 18:01, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
File:Algal mat in Marine Park (90933).jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 7 Feb 2024 at 19:37:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Other_lifeforms
- Info An algal mat. Came across a bunch of algal mats a couple years ago and thought they were very pretty. As far as I understand, this is primarily cyanobacteria, and hence not classified as algae (confusingly, these structures are still called algal mats, and cyanobacteria is commonly called algae). Could use help with the gallery categorization. all by — Rhododendrites talk | 19:37, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 19:37, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 19:46, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support Fascinating because of the fine and coarse details of the structures. I think the slightly fuzzy elements in the lower right do not detract from the overall impression. -- Radomianin (talk) 22:05, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 08:49, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Radomianin Cmao20 (talk) 12:02, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support Killarnee (talk) 16:45, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Radomianin. --Aristeas (talk) 20:17, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 23:44, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:40, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Not exceptional in clarity or composition. -- Karelj (talk) 22:54, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
File:Mantis ootheca in Marine Park (91115).jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 7 Feb 2024 at 19:30:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Arthropods#Family_:_Mantidae_(Mantids)
- Info A Chinese mantis (Tenodera sinensis) hatched out ootheca (the egg mass structure). all by — Rhododendrites talk | 19:30, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 19:30, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 19:47, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 12:02, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support Simple but attractive, good light and background. --Aristeas (talk) 07:59, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:28, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very good to me. Excellent details. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:37, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:40, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 17:32, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
File:MAERSK HANOI Container Ship (Port Koper SIKOP, 2023).jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 7 Feb 2024 at 15:46:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water_transport#Ships
- Info Maersk Hanoi container ship at Koper Port. My shot. -- Mile (talk) 15:46, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mile (talk) 15:46, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support Юрий Д.К 19:03, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
Support ★ 19:12, 29 January 2024 (UTC)- There is a perspective problem on the right side. ★ 03:32, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Uneven composition. Too uneven to consider this one of this site's finest pictures. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:49, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support Striking colours and composition Cmao20 (talk) 12:01, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao20. -- Radomianin (talk) 13:44, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Aristeas (talk) 20:16, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 23:45, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The containers at the back of the ship fall off at the next major well. On one container in the middle you can only see Maers without the K. Was that retouched out?--Ermell (talk) 09:21, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
- Ermell All is original. Its a drone shot. Doing PD here wont bring any good. I have tried. --Mile (talk) 17:41, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose ~Moheen (keep talking) 16:20, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per above Poco a poco (talk) 13:11, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Info
PD corected. Check again all. Ermell, (keep talking), Poco a poco. --Mile (talk) 18:49, 3 February 2024 (UTC) - Info Overslept it, extacly that what ★ said. Take it as all. Corecting PD just wont go. Back to original. Corecting stong PD wont go, enjoy picture as it is. --Mile (talk) 08:39, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Unfortunately, neither one nor the other convinces me. What a pity. You are too close to the object with the drone so that the perspective is difficult to correct. I will not comply with the unfriendly request you left on my discussion page to keep me away from your nominations. Everyone has the right to judge other people's pictures. That the objections were not unfounded can be seen from the fact that I am not alone in my opinion.--Ermell (talk) 10:21, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 19:02, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
File:Alley in Colatina.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period ends on 7 Feb 2024 at 12:29:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#Brazil
- Info Alley in Colatina, Espírito Santo, Brazil. Created, uploaded and nominated by ★ -- ★ 12:29, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support As per Cmao20's recommendation. Pinging the previous voters: Thi, Cmao20 and Draceane. -- ★ 12:29, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Draceane talkcontrib. 12:40, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral per my comments on the withdrawn set, it is the best original image you have submitted to FPC and I'm almost tempted to support as a vote of confidence, but given that it isn't centred and the image quality is not that good, I can't in good conscience call it one of the finest images on Commons even though I really like the motif and think it's a good photograph Cmao20 (talk) 12:00, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Cmao20: I understand and appreciate your comments; about the centralization: I don't know if you can see, but, from this point of view, the alley is slightly (almost imperceptibly) oriented to the left, so I tried my best to find some symmetry. ★ 12:27, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 14:33, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
Alternative[edit]
- Info I took this shot yesterday; better light, better centralized, square crop and RAW mode activated. Pinging Thi, Cmao20 Draceane and Tournasol7 to see my new work. ★ 11:31, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
- Comment This is indeed a much better composition, but the contrast is very strong. Yann (talk) 17:11, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
@Yann: Contrast improved. ★ 17:44, 31 January 2024 (UTC)- @Yann: I just took another picture a few minutes ago because the light conditions were better. ★ 18:28, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination Nominating the alternative as a separate candidate. ★ 19:58, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
File:Bloem van Anemone 'Honorine Jobert'. 29-08-2023. (actm.) 02.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 7 Feb 2024 at 05:28:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Ranunculaceae
- Info Flower of Anemone 'Honorine Jobert'. Focus stack of 80 photos.
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:28, 29 January 2024 (UTC) - Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:28, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 11:29, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support Simple, crisp and beautiful Cmao20 (talk) 12:07, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Draceane talkcontrib. 12:15, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 15:04, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 16:39, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support Юрий Д.К 19:05, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao20. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:54, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Background lets this down. Shadows etc. generated during the stacking. More care needed. Charlesjsharp (talk) 22:19, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose not done. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:39, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:07, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 14:33, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Laitche (talk) 16:39, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Aristeas (talk) 20:15, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Giles Laurent (talk) 10:51, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Charles. Please eliminate the halos that surround most of the flower. We shouldn't promote the picture in this condition. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:33, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Done. Halo’s removed. Thank you for your reviews.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:46, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Not removed to my eyes. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:39, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Edited halos again. Thank you for your comment.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:01, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- You can see them at full-page. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:43, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- I do see spots of shade and spots of morning dew here and there on the grass, but that's probably not what you mean.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:54, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Halos very obvious at thumbnail. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:34, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Agree there's a halo visible at thumbnail size in the last version uploaded -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:32, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Timetable (day 5 after nomination)[edit]
Wed 31 Jan → Mon 05 Feb Thu 01 Feb → Tue 06 Feb Fri 02 Feb → Wed 07 Feb Sat 03 Feb → Thu 08 Feb Sun 04 Feb → Fri 09 Feb Mon 05 Feb → Sat 10 Feb
Timetable (day 9 after nomination, last day of voting)[edit]
Sat 27 Jan → Mon 05 Feb Sun 28 Jan → Tue 06 Feb Mon 29 Jan → Wed 07 Feb Tue 30 Jan → Thu 08 Feb Wed 31 Jan → Fri 09 Feb Thu 01 Feb → Sat 10 Feb Fri 02 Feb → Sun 11 Feb Sat 03 Feb → Mon 12 Feb Sun 04 Feb → Tue 13 Feb Mon 05 Feb → Wed 14 Feb
Closing a featured picture promotion request[edit]
The bot[edit]
Note that the description below is for manual closure, this is mostly not needed anymore as there exists a bot (FPCBot) that counts the votes and handles the process below. However after the bot has counted the votes a manual review step is used to make sure the count is correct before the bot again picks up the work.
Manual procedure[edit]
Any experienced user may close requests.
- In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line with a space first)
(for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:The Bridge (August 2013).jpg). See also {{FPC-results-reviewed}}.
{{FPC-results-reviewed|support=x|oppose=x|neutral=x|featured=("yes" or "no")|gallery=xxx (leave blank if "featured=no")|sig=~~~~}} - Also edit the title of the candidate image template and add after the image tag
featured or not featured
For example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
becomes
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], featured === - Save your edit.
- If it is featured:
- Add the picture to the list of the four most recently featured pictures of an appropriate gallery of Commons:Featured pictures, list as the first one and delete the last one, so that the number is four again.
- Also add the picture to the appropriate gallery and section of Commons:Featured pictures, list. Click on the most appropriate link beneath where you just added it as one of the four images. An image should only appear ONE time in the galleries. After a successful nomination, the image can be placed in several of the Featured pictures categories.
- Add the template {{Assessments|featured=1}} to the image description page.
- If it was an alternative image, use the subpage/com-nom parameter: For example, if File:Foo.jpg was promoted at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bar.jpg, use {{Assessments|featured=1|com-nom=Bar.jpg}}
- If the image is already featured on another wikipedia, just add featured=1 to the Assessments template. For instance {{Assessments|enwiki=1}} becomes {{Assessments|enwiki=1|featured=1}}
- Add the picture to the chronological list of featured pictures. Put it in the gallery using this format: File:xxxxx.jpg|# - '''Headline'''<br>created by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], uploaded by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]
- The # should be replaced by 1 for the first image nominated that month, and counts up after that. Have a look at the other noms on that page for examples.
- You may simplify this if multiple things were done by the same user. E.g.: File:xxxxx.jpg|# - '''Headline'''<br>created, uploaded, and nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]
- Add == FP promotion ==
{{FPpromotion|File:XXXXX.jpg}} to the Talk Page of the nominator.
- As the last step (whether the image is featured or not; including {{FPX}}ed, {{FPD}}ed and withdrawn nominations), open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination you've just finished closing. It will be of the form:
{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}}
Copy it to the bottom of Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/February 2024), save that page, and remove it from the candidate list.
Closing a delisting request[edit]
- In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line with a space first)
'''Result:''' x delist, x keep, x neutral => /not/ delisted. ~~~~
(for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/Image:Astrolabe-Persian-18C.jpg) - Also edit the title of the delisting candidate image template and add after the image tag
delisted or not delisted
For example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] === becomes === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], delisted === - Move the actual template from Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list to the bottom of the actual month page on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/February 2024.
- If the outcome was not delisted, stop here. If it is delisted:
- Remove the picture from Commons:Featured pictures, list and any subpages.
- Edit the picture's description as follows:
- Replace the template {{Featured picture}} on the image description page by {{Delisted picture}}. If using the {{Assessments}} template, change featured=1 to featured=2 (do not change anything related to its status in other featured picture processes).
- Remove the image from all categories beginning with "Featured [pictures]" (example: Featured night photography, Featured pictures from Wiki Loves Monuments 2016, Featured pictures of Paris).
- Remove the "Commons quality assessment" claim (d:Property:P6731) "Wikimedia Commons featured picture" from the picture's Structured data.
- Add a delisting-comment to the original entry in chronological list of featured pictures in bold-face, e. g. delisted 2007-07-19 (1-6) with (1-6) meaning 1 keep and 6 delist votes (change as appropriate). The picture in the gallery is not removed.
- If this is a Delist and Replace, the delisting and promotion must both be done manually. To do the promotion, follow the steps in the above section. Note that the assessment tag on the file page and the promotion tag on the nominator's talk page won't pick up the /replace subpage that these nominations use.
Manual archiving of a withdrawn nomination[edit]
- In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
In the occasion that the FPCbot will not mark withdrawn nominations with a "to be reviewed" template and put them in Category:Featured picture candidates awaiting closure review just like if they were on the usual list, put the following "no" template:
{{FPC-results-reviewed|support=X|oppose=X|neutral=X|featured=no|gallery=|sig=--~~~~}} - Also edit the title of the candidate image template and add after the image tag
not featured
For example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
becomes
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], not featured === - Save your edit.
- Open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination. It will be of the form:
{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}}
Copy it to the bottom of Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/February 2024), save that page, and remove it from the candidate list.